This module is currently under review and minor changes will be updated on the web as soon as possible
Module Title |
Financial Accounting |
|
Module Code |
25-4006-00L |
|
Semester of Delivery |
See Module Information Table |
|
Mandatory/Elective/Option |
See Module Information Table |
|
Level |
4 |
|
Credit Points |
20 |
|
Assessment Mode Weighting |
Coursework |
40% |
Examination |
60% |
|
Pre-requisites |
None | |
Co-requisites |
None | |
Class Contact Hours |
||
Average Weekly |
1.5 |
|
Directed Learning |
||
Average Weekly |
5 |
|
Module Leader |
Peter Mulvihill |
|
|
Sheffield Business School |
|
Module Banding |
A |
|
Approval Status |
Validated |
Rationale:
Accounting is the process of classifying, measuring and communicating the economic transactions of business organisations. Accountants need to understand how this process is used to prepare financial statements for external users. They also need an understanding of reporting for limited companies and of how users of that information interpret the reports in order to make informed decisions.
Aims:
Anticipated Learning Outcomes:
On completion of the module, the student should be able to:
Indicative Content:
Skills Integration
Skills developed in this module will include numerical and IT skills, problem definition, problem analysis, problem solving and decision making. The use of information technology will be introduced through the CAL package (EQL), "Understanding Accounts", and will be developed through case study work using a computerised accounting software package (Sage).
Teaching and Learning Strategy and Methods
Topics and general principles will be introduced through lectures and directed study materials. The topics will be discussed and developed in seminars and the principles applied in practical exercises. Case studies may be used in the module and CAL packages will provide additional exercises.
Assessment and Feedback Strategy
Learning outcomes 1 to 4 will be assessed through the final examination. Learning outcomes 2 and 5 will be assessed through coursework. Course work will take the form of a comprehensive case study completed at a set time and date in a computer workshop. The weighting of coursework to final examination is 40% coursework and 60% final examination. This split reflects the fact that assessing outcome 5 can only be done in a computer workshop setting yet constitutes a substantial part of the syllabus.
Assessment Criteria
A table of assessment criteria (for students) and staff marking scheme will be prepared for each piece of the assessment (see example). These will show both students and staff how grades between "referral" (<35%) and "distinction" (70%+) are to be awarded.
Mark: |
Below 35/40% |
40 - 49% |
50 - 59% |
60 - 69% |
70% and above |
Outcome 1
|
Little or no knowledge of basic terminology, concepts and theory |
Some knowledge of basic terminology, concepts and theory |
Good knowledge of terminology, concepts and theory |
Good knowledge of terminology and a wide range of concepts and theory |
Extensive knowledge of terminology, concepts and theory, plus ability to explain it imaginatively |
Outcome 2
|
Little or no application of techniques, principles and procedures. |
Some application of techniques, principles and procedures. |
Clear application of techniques, principles and procedures. |
Good application of techniques, principles and procedures. |
Excellent application of techniques, principles and procedures. |
Outcome 3
|
Little or no analysis and interpretation |
Some analysis and interpretation |
Good analysis and interpretation |
Good analysis and interpretation showing insight into issues and problems |
Excellent analysis and interpretation showing firm understanding of issues and ability to solve problems |
Outcome 4
|
Poorly written, hard to follow, many spelling and grammatical errors. |
Able to follow points made, some spelling or grammatical errors |
Reader-friendly and only a few spelling and grammatical errors |
Very reader-friendly, no spelling and grammatical errors |
Very reader-friendly, no spelling and grammatical errors, imaginative approach to communication |
Outcome 5
|
Little or no evidence of ability to use the software |
Some evidence of ability to use the software |
Application of the software for much of the case study |
Ability shown to use the software to complete all aspects of the case study |
Ability shown to use the software to complete all aspects of the case study accurately |