Module Title |
Business Ethics |
|
Module Code |
25-6003-00L |
|
Semester of Delivery |
See Module Information Table |
|
Mandatory/Elective/Option |
See Module Information Table |
|
Level |
6 |
|
Credit Points |
20 |
|
Assessment Mode Weighting |
CWEX100 | |
Pre-requisites |
None | |
Co-requisites |
None | |
Class Contact Hours |
||
Average Weekly |
1.5 |
|
Directed Learning |
||
Average Weekly |
5 |
|
Module Leader |
Jim Chandler |
|
|
Sheffield Business School |
|
Module Banding |
A |
|
Approval Status |
Validated |
Rationale
Students engaged in management in either the private, public, or third sector should conform to established codes of moral conduct and expect that their superiors and those whom they manage also follow acceptable standards of morality. In order to appreciate this inescapable component of work experience it is important that students have an appreciation of the status of moral and ethical statements and of their rationale. Such an understanding must rest on sound theoretical foundations which can be used by the student to justify their moral standpoint and also it is essential these values can be applied by the student in the workplace and social life.
More broadly a society composed of individuals who lack any sound independent capacity to justify moral beliefs or to tolerate where appropriate the beliefs of others is likely to harbour serious injustices that may, in turn, lead to instability and disruption of social life and serious damage to the well-being of civil society and the individual.
Summary of Aims
To provide students with an appreciation of basic ethical principles and a capacity to be able to apply this capacity to management and decision making practice.
Anticipated Learning OutcomesOn completion of the module students should be able to:
Students will be assessed through formative and summative assessment which will receive equal weighting.
Formative assessment will be used both to assess students' capacity to master the learning outcomes and also to provide feedback to enable them to improve their abilities in this subject area.
Students will be expected to show an understanding of theory through essays and case study assignments and to be able to critically appreciate differences in theoretical approaches.
Students will be required to demonstrate that they can apply their theoretical understanding through reasoned solutions to problems based on case studies both within their formative and summative assessment.
Students will be required to demonstrate that they can present rational argument concerning the application of ethical values through class based presentations as well as through the provision of written material.
Module Assessment Criteria
Learning Outcome |
Assessment Criterion |
Level descriptors |
||||
fail |
PASS |
2.2 |
2.1 |
First |
||
Outcome 1 |
Coursework assignments and examination |
No capacity to analyse ethical concepts |
Weak or sketchy capacity to analyse ethical concepts |
Moderate capacity to analyse ethical concepts |
Good capacity to analyse ethical concepts |
Excellent capacity to analyse ethical concepts |
Outcome 2 |
Coursework assignments and examination |
Little or no appreciation of ideas of ethical thinkers |
Very basic or erratic appreciation of ideas of ethical thinkers |
Some appreciation of ideas of ethical thinkers |
Thorough appreciation of ideas of ethical thinkers |
Detailed and imaginative appreciation of ideas of ethical thinkers |
Outcome 3 |
Coursework assignments and examination |
Little or no critical capacity or evidence of toleration |
Limited critical capacity and evidence of toleration |
Moderate critical capacity and evidence of toleration |
Sound critical capacity and evidence of toleration |
Excellent critical capacity and mature ability toleration |
Outcome 4 |
Coursework assignments and examination |
Little or no ability to appreciate the impact of ethical thought |
Limited ability to appreciate the impact of ethical thought |
Moderate to appreciate the impact of ethical thought |
Sound to appreciate the impact of ethical thought |
Excellent to appreciate the impact of ethical thought |
Outcome 5 |
Coursework assignments and examination |
None or very poor capacity to relate ethical values to work practice |
Poor capacity to relate ethical values to work practice |
Adequate capacity to relate ethical values to work practice |
Good capacity to relate ethical values to work practice |
Highly developed capacity to relate ethical values to work practice |
Outcome 6 |
Coursework assignments and examination |
Poor capacity to convey information and understanding either orally, visually or in writing |
Low capacity to convey information and understanding either orally, visually or in writing |
Acceptable capacity to convey information and understanding either orally, visually or in writing |
Well developed capacity to convey information and understanding either orally, visually or in writing |
Excellent capacity to convey information and understanding either orally, visually or in writing |
Teaching and Learning Strategy and Methods
Teaching will be conveyed through
Indicative Content
Donaldson, J., 1989, Key Issues in Business Ethics, London, Academic Press.
Downie, R.S. 1964, Government, Action and Morality, London, Macmillan.
Enderle, G. (ed.), 1999, International Business Ethics, Notre Dame, Ind, University of Notre Dame Press.
Lawton, A., 1998, Ethical Management for the Public Services, Buckingham, Open University Press
Leach, R., 1991 British Political Ideologies, London, Philip Allan.
Mill, J.S., 1975, 'Essay Concerning Representative Government' in Wollheim, R. John Stuart Mill Three Essays Oxford, Oxford University Press. (Liberty; Representative Government; The Subjugation of Women)
Russell, B., 1946, A History of Western Philosophy, London, Secker and Warburg
Singer, P. (ed) 1991, A Companion to Ethics, Oxford, Basil Blackwell
Smith, K. and Johnson, P., 1996, (eds.) Business Ethics, London. International Thompson