Module Title |
Financial Decision Making |
|
Module Code |
25-6025-00L |
|
Semester of Delivery |
2 |
|
Mandatory/Elective/Option |
||
Level |
6 |
|
Credit Points |
20 |
|
Assessment Mode Weighting |
CW100 | |
Pre-requisites |
Whilst there are no formal prerequisites, students are required to have a reasonable level of financial knowledge |
|
Co-requisites |
None | |
Class Contact Hours |
||
Average Weekly |
1.5 |
|
Directed Learning |
||
Average Weekly |
5 |
|
Module Leader |
Trevor Hassall |
|
|
Sheffield Business School |
|
Module Banding |
A |
|
Approval Status |
Validated |
Rationale
In practice accountants and consultants synthesise subject knowledge, from a variety of areas, and use various skills to solve problems identified within organisations. Experience of integrating knowledge and skills in a practical problem solving environment is essential for the development of professional competence. Students with practical expertise gained via placement will be encouraged to incorporate this into their learning experience.
Summary of AimsWithin a financial context the module aims to develop
On completion of the module, the student should be able to;
Case studies are used as the basis for group work and the students are required to undertake a range of activities such as role playing in contexts where ethical dilemmas are encountered. Where presentations are required, these are in a range of different formats including formal public presentations and less formal presentations to a management group. Verbal and/or written comments are provided by staff for each group activity. This is either immediate, in the case of verbal comment, or within a week in the case of written comments.
There is an emphasis on the learning process and this is the subject of peer assessment for group activities (students allocate 50% of group marks). In addition students prepare a learning diary which is an aid to reflection and provides staff with an insight into the learning experience of the student. Assessment of this reflects the level of reflection and critical awareness shown by the student.
All learning outcomes will be assessed through coursework.Module Assessment Criteria
As will be seen from the detailed aims and objectives on the sheet above, we expect students to develop a range of high level academic and reflective skills. Marks are awarded for assessment as follows:
Learning Outcome |
Assessment Criterion |
Level descriptors |
||||
fail |
PASS |
2.2 |
2.1 |
First |
||
Outcome 1 |
Fails to identify appropriate subject knowledge |
General area identified but weakly |
General area identified but specifics could be better |
Good identification of appropriate subject knowledge |
Excellent identification of specific and appropriate subject knowledge |
|
Outcome 2 |
Fails to identify problems |
Identifies problems but not in sufficient depth |
Identifies problems well but lacking in creativity and lateral thinking |
Good identification of problems, some creativity and insight |
Identification of problems displays creativity, insight and maturity |
|
Outcome 3 |
Fails to identify and apply appropriate skills |
Applies appropriate skills and knowledge but not necessarily in an entirely appropriate manner |
Applies appropriate skills and knowledge appropriately but not perhaps comprehensively |
Applies appropriate skills and knowledge appropriately and comprehensively but a little lacking in creativity and insight |
Applies appropriate skills and knowledge appropriately and comprehensively, displays creativity, insight and maturity |
|
Outcome 4 |
Fails to do this adequately. Poor data and lack of organisation |
Data or organisation could be better as could the sources of information accessed |
Appropriate information accessed but organisation and processing could be improved |
Appropriate information accessed Organisation and processing good but a little lacking in creativity and insight |
Really good information accessed Organisation and processing good Displays creativity, insight and maturity |
|
Outcome 5 |
Disorganised presentation, little indication of getting to grips with issues |
Presentation adequate but lacking in imagination. Questions answered but not convincingly |
Reasonable presentation using appropriate visual aids etc. |
Good presentation. Appropriate approaches to presentation including visual aids etc. answers questions well |
Really professional presentation. Displays creativity, insight and maturity |
|
Outcome 6** |
Learning diary shows no perception of the learning processes or the way in which groups operated |
Learning diary shows some perception of the learning processes and the way in which groups operated but generally lacks analytical insight |
Learning diary shows reasonable perception of the learning processes and the way in which groups operated but could develop analytical insights better |
Learning diary shows good perception of the learning processes and the way in which groups operated but creativity and insight could be better developed |
Learning diary shows really good perception of the learning processes and the way in which groups operated. Demonstrates creativity and insight and also shows self awareness |
|
Outcome 7 |
Learning diary shows no perception of the quality of the individual's contributions or that of other group members |
Learning diary shows some perception of the quality of the individual's contributions and that of other group members but little analysis or interpretation of these |
Learning diary shows reasonable perception of the quality of the individual's contributions and that of other group members. There is some analysis and interpretation of these but it needs to be developed further |
Learning diary shows good perception of the quality of the individual's contributions and that of other group members. There is analysis and interpretation of these but this could be developed further |
Learning diary shows really good perception of the quality of the individual's contributions and that of other group members. There is high quality analysis and interpretation of these that demonstrate real self awareness |
Teaching and Learning Strategy and Methods
This is a student based course which involves very little transfer of knowledge but a great deal of application and development of existing knowledge and skills. There is relatively little contact time. Whole group sessions concentrate on skills development and feedback on progress. Otherwise, students attend in groups of approximately 5 for sessions that involve either the presentation of information and analysis to staff who are role playing client audiences of various types, or other activities such as role playing the staff of a business involved in a significant ethical dilemma. Small group sessions last for 40 minutes.
Indicative ContentThe nature of the current environment will inevitably determine the topic areas covered by the course and these will be continually amended to reflect a balance between the traditional and current emerging issues.
The module does not seek to provide students with a new body of knowledge. It is, rather, concerned with the development and synthesis of the knowledge that students have acquired elsewhere in their studies.
Indicative Reading ListThere is no reading list as such. Students are expected to access as much relevant information as possible.