Module Title |
Measuring Business Performance |
|
Module Code |
25-6042-00L |
|
Semester of Delivery |
See Module Information Table |
|
Mandatory/Elective/Option |
See Module Information Table |
|
Level |
20 |
|
Credit Points |
6 |
|
Assessment Mode Weighting |
Coursework |
25% |
Examination |
75% |
|
NOTE: The University is currently reviewing its assessment regulations for 2008/09 and the assessment package for this module may be subject to change. |
||
Pre-requisites |
Business Accounting or equivalent |
|
Co-requisites |
None | |
Class Contact Hours |
||
Average Weekly |
1.5 |
|
Directed Learning |
||
Average Weekly |
5 |
|
Module Leader |
John Cullen |
|
|
Sheffield Business School |
|
Module Banding |
A |
|
Approval Status |
Validated |
Rationale
It is important for managers within organisations to identify whether the organisation is achieving its strategic objectives, to understand how others may view the organisation's progress, and to be able to assess the performance of competitors or other organisations. Performance measurement needs to recognise both financial and non-financial measures of performance and be balanced in its approach. Used appropriately, performance measurement systems can be the foundation of an integrated and iterative strategic management system.
Summary of Aims
To develop the ability to evaluate financial statements and performance measures, alongside non financial measures of performance, which together provide a balanced approach to identifying whether an organisation is achieving it's strategic objectives.
Anticipated Learning Outcomes
On completion of the module, the student should be able to:
Assessment and Feedback Strategy
Students will be provided with feedback on their progress in achieving the desired learning outcomes throughout the module via a combination of normal seminar activities. Elements of learning outcomes requiring literary and data search and analysis, or extended case-study analysis, will be assessed by way of coursework. Elements of learning outcomes requiring skills of critical analysis of conceptual propositions or application to practice will be assessed by a final, time-constrained, examination which will normally be linked to a case study of a major corporation.
Module Assessment Criteria
Learning Outcome |
Assessment Criterion |
Level descriptors |
||||
fail |
PASS |
2.2 |
2.1 |
First |
||
Outcome 1 |
Coursework and /or examination |
Poor knowledge of topic (eg concepts, definitions); Inadequate review of key issues from literature; |
Limited knowledge of topic; Description (but limited consideration) of key issues from literature; |
Clear knowledge of topic; Clear grasp and review of key issues from literature; |
Critical consideration of literature; Critical and perceptive knowledge of topic; |
Excellent knowledge and perceptive critique of concepts and literature; Excellent and perceptive conclusion |
Outcome 2 |
Coursework and / or examination |
Poor knowledge of topic (eg concepts, definitions); Inadequate review of key issues from literature; |
Limited knowledge of topic; Description (but limited consideration) of key issues from literature; |
Clear knowledge of topic; Clear grasp and review of key issues from literature; |
Critical consideration of literature; Critical and perceptive knowledge of topic; |
Excellent knowledge and perceptive critique of concepts and literature; Excellent and perceptive conclusion |
Outcome 3 |
Coursework and / or examination |
Poor knowledge of topic (eg concepts, definitions); Inadequate review of key issues from literature; |
Limited knowledge of topic; Description (but limited consideration) of key issues from literature; |
Clear knowledge of topic; Clear grasp and review of key issues from literature; |
Critical consideration of literature; Critical and perceptive knowledge of topic; |
Excellent knowledge and perceptive critique of concepts and literature; Excellent and perceptive conclusion |
Outcome 4 |
Coursework and / or examination |
Poor knowledge of topic (eg concepts, definitions); Inadequate review of key issues from literature; |
Limited knowledge of topic; Description (but limited consideration) of key issues from literature; |
Clear knowledge of topic; Clear grasp and review of key issues from literature; |
Critical consideration of literature; Critical and perceptive knowledge of topic; |
Excellent knowledge and perceptive critique of concepts and literature; Excellent and perceptive conclusion |
Outcome 5 |
Coursework and examination |
Inadequate application of theory to practice Inadequate analysis and failure to identify key issues Little or no evidence of data gathering or literature search. |
Limited application of theory to practice Identification of some issues but commentary tending to be descriptive rather than analytical Limited evidence of data gathering or literature search. |
A reasoned attempt to apply theoretical models to practice Consistent analysis and identification of key issues Good evidence of data gathering or literature search. |
Critical and perceptive application of theoretical models to practice Critical and perceptive analysis and identification of issues and evidence Evidence of good use and breadth of data gathering or literature search |
Excellent and perceptive application of theoretical models to practice Perceptive and focused analysis of key issues, with critical insight Excellent use and breadth of data gathering or literature search |
Teaching and Learning Strategy and Methods
Keynote lectures will be supplemented and supported by seminars at which case studies and directed readings will be analysed.
Indicative Content