|
Module Title |
Organisational Change and Consultancy Skills |
|
| Module Code |
25-6045-00L |
|
|
Semester of Delivery |
See Module Information Table |
|
|
Mandatory/Elective/Option |
See Module Information Table |
|
|
Level |
6 |
|
|
Credit Points |
20 |
|
|
Assessment Mode Weighting |
CW100 | |
|
Pre-requisites |
Placement Year or equivalent level of experience |
|
|
Co-requisites |
None |
|
|
Class Contact Hours |
||
|
Average Weekly |
1.5 |
|
|
Directed Learning |
||
|
Average Weekly |
5 |
|
|
Module Leader |
John Darwin |
|
|
|
Sheffield Business School |
|
|
Module Banding |
A |
|
|
Approval Status |
Validated |
|
Rationale
This module has been designed to develop in students a critical understanding of change processes through the development of analytical and consulting understanding and skills.
The challenges faced by many organisations undergoing rapid and continuous change have profound implications for the people working in them. Many such organisations are increasingly identifying the need for learning, creativity and involvement in order to achieve their goals, and internal or external `consultants' who can facilitate the development of ideas, behaviours and solutions, can often assist in the achievement of these corporate requirements. The use of the analytical approaches and the skills associated with change consultancy can often be an important part of the manager's working life. Those wishing to enter the field of management or further to develop their understanding and skills in this area require a critical awareness of the field of study and of the interpersonal dynamics associated with change and consultancy.
The module meets the growing need for business students to possess a clear understanding of the dynamics of the consulting process and to develop the personal and professional skills to be effective in managing change.
Summary of AimsThis module aims to frame change as process, rather than an event. Students will be introduced to the field of understanding and managing change and will be encouraged and aided to reflect critically on their ability to understand and engage with the field of study.
The module will also introduce students to a range of views on the role of the consultant in the change situation, and on the dynamics of client/consultant relationships. Using a variety of methods students will critically explore consulting models and theories and, through interactive workshop activities and simulated interventions, they will be able to explore the role of the consultant.
Though critical reflection on their own experience, students will gain insight of themselves as consultants and the personal approach they bring the field of change and the consulting arena.
Anticipated Learning OutcomesOn completion of the module students should be able to:
Assessment and Feedback Strategy
Assessment will be via two pieces of work:
|
Learning Outcome |
Assessment Criterion |
Level descriptors |
||||
|
fail |
PASS |
2.2 |
2.1 |
First |
||
|
Outcome 1 |
Critical Essay Group Project |
Inaccurate representation of theory, concepts etc. No referencing or attribution. Lack of context Confused discussion or argument. |
Descriptive approach, showing some understanding of theory, concepts etc. Little attribution Limited contextualisation Coherent discussion/ presentation. |
Accurate utilisation of theory, concepts etc. Limited appropriate attribution. Contributing disciplines identified, understood and illustrated |
Accurate utilisation of theory, concepts etc. Appropriate and broad use of referencing and attribution. Contributing disciplines identified, understood (illustrated through example and critical appraisal) |
Rigorous use of theory, concepts etc. exhaustive referencing and attribution Discursive approach Critical assessment of issues raised. |
|
Outcome 2 |
Critical Essay |
Failure to establish relevance of material utilised. Inaccurate identification of consultancy roles and contributions |
Descriptive approach, showing some understanding of typologies and models. Limited attribution. limited identification of roles/descriptive approach to contribution |
Straightforward approach, showing accurate understanding of typologies and models Understanding of consultancy roles through illustration and contextualisation. |
Clear and coherent identification of appropriate typologies and models. Discussion of roles set in context and illustrated by example, illustration and critical evaluation. |
Clear and coherent identification of wide range of typologies and models. Coherent and well reasoned discussion of roles set in context and illustrated by example and illustration. |
|
Outcome 3 |
Critical Essay Group Project |
Failure to demonstrate understanding of subject material. Inability to utilise models |
Descriptive approach Limited though broadly accurate application of model to situations |
Accurate utilisation of theory, concepts etc. Appropriate and accurate use of models in representing culture |
Accurate utilisation of theory, concepts etc. Appropriate and accurate use of models in representing culture. critical evaluation of appropriateness and likely effectiveness |
Rigorous and wide ranging utilisation of theory, concepts etc. Critical and insightful use of appropriate models in representing culture |
|
Outcome 4 |
Critical Essay |
Failure to produce evidence of critical evaluation, and/or recognition of skills required. |
Limited evaluation of skills required Some evidence for development is produced |
Broadly accurate evaluation of skills required Personally appropriate evidence for development is produced |
Rounded and accurate critical evaluation of skills required. Demonstration through personal illustration and application of appropriate evidence for development. |
Accurate evaluation of change agent skills required, showing insight and the ability to work with feedback. Evidence for development is imaginatively identified and demonstrated. |
|
Outcome 5 |
Group Project |
Inaccurate or irrelevant analysis Irrelevant or unclear strategic plan |
Descriptive approach Little attempt (or failure) to set in context Limited but generally appropriate plan |
Evidence of analytical approach, Set in context. Generally appropriate plan, supported by assessment of likely impact |
Demonstration of understanding of wide range and complexity of issues of resistance. Sensible and relevant strategic plan. |
Rigorous demonstration of understanding of the range and complexity of issues of resistance. Innovative and thoughtful strategic plan. |
|
Outcome 6 |
Critical Essay Group Project |
Inaccurate or unclear diagnosis. Use of inappropriate data gathering techniques |
Limited integration of theory/practice. Restricted but generally appropriate use of data gathering techniques |
Generally accurate and appropriate integration of theory/practice in analysis Appropriate use of data gathering techniques, with evidence of consideration of application issues. |
Accurate use of analytical approaches, based on selected and relevant theoretical base. Appropriate use of relevant data gathering techniques, with evidence of consideration of application issues. |
Innovative use of theoretical and conceptual approaches. Underpinning carefully thought-through analytical approaches. Data gathering techniques are demonstrably appropriate to the problem and the particular context, and are justified. |
Teaching and Learning Strategy and Methods
The learning strategy adopted will encourage participants to explore both theoretical and experiential inputs to the fields of change and consultancy.
Activities will include:
The module addresses the student's personal, professional and academic development in the fields of change management and consultancy. The content reflects these aims: