Module Title |
Regulation of Business |
|
Module Code |
25-6049-00L |
|
Semester of Delivery |
See Module Information Table |
|
Mandatory/Elective/Option |
See Module Information Table |
|
Level |
6 |
|
Credit Points |
20 |
|
Assessment Mode Weighting |
Coursework |
50% |
Examination |
50% |
|
NOTE: The University is currently reviewing its assessment regulations for 2008/09 and the assessment package for this module may be subject to change. |
||
Pre-requisites |
None | |
Co-requisites |
None | |
Class Contact Hours |
||
Average Weekly |
1.5 |
|
Directed Learning |
||
Average Weekly |
5 |
|
Module Leader |
Michael Hunt |
|
School |
Sheffield Business School |
|
Module Banding |
A |
|
Approval Status |
Validated |
Rationale
In a complex liberal democracy neither business nor government occupy independent environments. Both are inextricably linked in terms of strategy and development. Business are regulated constantly by government and its many agencies to ensure that they remain competitive with one another, but also do not operate to the detriment of society as a whole. However, within a democracy, government policy is greatly influenced by the needs and demands of business which through policy networks and more overt pressure can greatly influence public policy to be coincident with their objectives.
Summary of Aims
To develop an appreciation among public sector and business studies students of the complex inter-relationships between businesses and government that regulate business competitiveness, development and strategy.
Anticipated Learning OutcomesOn completion of the module students should be able to demonstrate
Assessment and Feedback Strategy
Students will be assessed through 50% formative coursework and 50% summative examination.
The formative assessment will be based on written work and also an oral presentation to ensure that students communicate their ideas through a variety of means.
Students will receive feedback from written comments on both their written and oral presentations and when required through surgeries with the tutor.
The summative assessment will be designed to ensure students can combine diverse elements of the course into a comprehensive understanding of the business regulation.
Module Assessment Criteria
Learning Outcome |
Assessment Criterion |
Level descriptors |
||||
fail |
PASS |
2.2 |
2.1 |
First |
||
Outcome 1 |
Course work and examination |
Highly inaccurate and incomplete |
Some basic knowledge but at a low level of accuracy |
working knowledge with most areas of study recognised |
sound general knowledge and some capacity to provide knowledge in depth |
extensive knowledge and a capacity to provide knowledge in depth |
Outcome 2 |
Course work and examination |
Little comprehension or relevance of material |
Some capacity for comprehension but at a very perfunctory level |
Acceptable level of analysis showing a capacity to grasp the major framework provided in course material |
A sound comprehension that shows a capacity to relate together theory and data and literature |
A capacity to comprehend theory and to apply this with some originality to data and literature |
Outcome 3 |
Course work and examination |
Little comprehension or relevance of material |
Some capacity for comprehension but at a very perfunctory level |
Acceptable level of analysis showing a capacity to grasp the major framework provided in course material |
A sound comprehension that shows a capacity to relate together theory and data and literature |
A capacity to comprehend theory and to apply this with some originality to data and literature |
Outcome 4 |
Course work and examination |
Highly inaccurate and incomplete |
Some basic knowledge but at a low level of accuracy |
working knowledge with most areas of study recognised |
sound general knowledge and some capacity to provide knowledge in depth |
extensive knowledge and a capacity to provide knowledge in depth |
Outcome 5 |
Course work and examination |
Highly inaccurate and incomplete |
Some basic knowledge but at a low level of accuracy |
working knowledge with most areas of study recognised |
sound general knowledge and some capacity to provide knowledge in depth |
extensive knowledge and a capacity to provide knowledge in depth |
Outcome 6 |
Course work and examination |
Little comprehension or relevance of material |
Some capacity for comprehension but at a very perfunctory level |
Acceptable level of analysis showing a capacity to grasp the major framework provided in course material |
A sound comprehension that shows a capacity to relate together theory and data and literature |
A capacity to comprehend theory and to apply this with some originality to data and literature |
Outcome 7 |
Course work and examination |
Inability to relate theory to empirical framework |
Perfunctory awareness of connectivity of theory and empirical content |
A modest attempt at relating theory to empirical content |
A clear capacity to be able to develop argument through effective use of theory |
A capacity to critically evaluate theory in relation to the empirical framework |
Outcome 8 |
Course work and examination |
Largely inarticulate and difficult to comprehend |
Low level of literary competence |
Acceptable but rather basic literary and oral/visual competence |
Good use of English and sound oral and presentational skills |
Literary emulation of Henry James and excellent oral fluency supported where relevant by good use of visual media |
Outcome 9 |
Course work and examination |
No evidence of research or attempt to debate and analyse the issues |
Perfunctory research based largely on materials provided by tutors/lecturer and little capacity for debate |
Evidence of some research and a capacity to discuss issues |
Considerable research around the subject and a readiness to argue and debate issues |
Extensive research into the subject area and a capacity to lead debate on the issues. |
Teaching and Learning Strategy and Methods
Teaching will be conveyed through
Indicative Content