Module Title |
Strategic Management |
|
Module Code |
25-6057-00L |
|
Semester of Delivery |
See Module Information Table |
|
Mandatory/Elective/Option |
See Module Information Table |
|
Level |
6 |
|
Credit Points |
20 |
|
Assessment Mode Weighting |
CWEX100 | |
Pre-requisites |
General business education to level 5 |
|
Co-requisites |
None | |
Class Contact Hours |
||
Average Weekly |
1.5 |
|
Directed Learning |
||
Average Weekly |
5 |
|
Module Leader |
Roger Oldham |
|
|
Sheffield Business School |
|
Module Banding |
A |
|
Approval Status |
Validated |
Rationale
The module exists primarily to help students make sense of the behaviour of the organisations in which they will work.
To achieve this it sets students' past and future studies, what they have experienced of organisations and what they will experience in the context of the purpose of the organisation as a whole.
It, therefore, aids the integration of studies with each other and with the world of work in organisations.
Summary of AimsOn completion of the module students should be able to:
Assessment and Feedback Strategy
Students will be given feedback on their progress in the achievement of their learning outcomes by way of tutor feedback during seminars and feedback on formal coursework.
As at 2001, we are exploring the use of self-administered assessment such as computer based tests to provide formative feedback.
Coursework (weighted at 40% of the total mark) will be used to assess students' analytic ability and their ability to apply their knowledge and techniques, using examples which are current and relevant.
Students' analytical ability and knowledge and comprehension of the whole module will be assessed by an examination weighted at 60% of the total mark.
Module Assessment Criteria
Learning Outcome |
Assessment Criterion |
Level descriptors |
||||
fail |
PASS |
2.2 |
2.1 |
First |
||
Outcome 1 |
Coursework & exam |
Introduces little or no theory and demonstrates poor or no understanding of how it works or can be applied. |
Introduces a small amount of theory showing a mediocre level of understanding of the theory and its application |
Introduces a reasonable range of theory and demonstrates a n acceptable level of understanding of the theory and its application |
Introduces and uses a wide range of theory and literature clearly related to the issues, showing an effective understanding of how the theory works internally and how it can be applied |
Introduces and uses a very wide range of contrasting literature demonstrating deep understanding of the mechanics and meaning of the theory in relation to other theory and its application |
Outcome 2 |
Coursework & exam |
Fails to assess significance of theories and concepts and to appraise their relevance particularly in the real world |
Analyses theory and concepts but comes to unclear or not wholly justified conclusions |
Analyses theory and concepts but may sometimes fail to assess them critically and may come to justified but superficial conclusions |
Analyses theory and concepts critically; applies theory and concepts to real world situations, coming to clear, well justified conclusions about the material |
Analyses theory and concepts with original perspectives and insight, showing how the underlying methodologies relate and coming to clear, very well justified conclusions about the material |
Outcome 3 |
Coursework & exam |
Fails to state the important factors in the situation and uses inappropriate theory or concepts or applies appropriate theory or concepts inadequately |
States the situation but may be partly unclear or misses important points. Applies concepts but may do so only partly effectively and shows mediocre understanding of the realities of the situation or of the significance of the theory |
States reasonably clearly the practical situation but may miss significant points; applies concepts reasonably effectively showing some understanding of the realities of the situation and the significance of the theory |
States clearly and concisely the practical situation; applies concepts and theories effectively and realistically showing understanding of both theory and practice |
States clearly, concisely and comprehensively the practical situation ; applies concepts and theories with insight and imagination showing deep understanding of both theory and practice |
Outcome 4 |
Coursework & exam |
Fails to analyse practical situation using theories and concepts and to appraise their relevance particularly in the real world |
Analyses practical situation but not in a critical manner applying theory and concepts, coming to unclear, or not very well justified conclusions about the material |
Analyses practical situation but not in a consistently critical manner applying theory and concepts, coming to clear, justified conclusions about the material |
Analyses practical situation critically applying theory and concepts, coming to clear, well justified conclusions about the material |
Analyses practical situation critically with original perspectives and insight, showing how the underlying theoretical methodologies relate and coming to clear, very well justified conclusions about the material |
Outcome 5 |
Coursework & exam |
Makes few recommendations to deal with problems or issues and which are not justified in terms of the analysis performed (if any); shows little understanding of the real world |
Makes few superficial recommendations to deal with problems or issues which are indifferently justified in terms of the analysis performed but which are not original or informed by understanding of the real world |
Makes some recommendations to deal with problems or issues which are reasonably well justified in terms of the analysis performed - or a large number of superficially-justified ones - but which are not original or informed by understanding of the real world |
Makes a good number recommendations to deal with problems or issues which are clearly justified in terms of the analysis performed but which may be informed by originality and understanding of the real world |
Makes a good number of innovative recommendations to deal with problems or issues which are clearly and well justified in terms of the analysis performed but which are informed by originality and understanding of the real world |
The key element in assessing both examination and assignments will be the extent to which students used appropriate theory and concepts to build and evaluate arguments.
The assessment will also specifically take into account:
Teaching and Learning Strategy and Methods
Students at university find Strategic Management a notoriously difficult subject. One reaction to this is to reduce expectations of their performance. We have resisted this and over time have developed incrementally an approach which delivers high performance. This is a highly structured sequence of lectures which outline the subject and a series of varied seminars which enable students to work on the other learning outcomes. We plan to continue this developmental approach whilst developing alternatives, eg electronic self- assessment, text-book related websites, fewer, more structuring lectures, fewer seminars but designed to encourage synthesis.
Detailed seminar methods include video and written case studies, group presentations, group problem-solving, and class discussion, sometimes polemical. These are all used to promote skills in application, synthesis and evaluation.
Indicative ContentThis is concerned with understanding the strategic position of the organisation, that is considering the organisation in its environment and asking what changes are going on in that environment, and how they will affect the organisation and its activities. What is the resource strength of the organisation in the context of these changes? What is it that people and groups associated with the organisation - managers, shareholders or owners, unions and so on - aspire to, and how do these affect the present position and what could happen in the future?
The variety of strategic options available to organisations will be considered.
Three aspects that must be addressed when developing strategies will be considered:
We will then consider methods of assessing the suitability of strategic options. There are three broad areas of assessment: strategic logic, cultural fit and research evidence. Each area will be discussed in detail. This will conclude our review of Strategic Choice.
This is concerned with the translation of strategy into action. We consider how resources have to be reallocated between departments, functions and projects given a change in strategy. Organisational restructuring of companies following a change in strategy is also considered. Changes in organisational culture that may accompany changes in organisational strategy are also explored.
This will review how strategic management occurs in practice. We will also consider differing viewpoints of strategy, looking at aspects such as how internal organisational politics or external environmental factors influence strategy formulation.
Indicative Reading List
Exploring Corporate Strategy: Texts and Cases, Gerry Johnson and Kevan Scholes - 5th edition, Prentice Hall 1999.
The Strategy Process, Henry Mintzberg and James Brian Quinn, Prentice Hall, 2nd edition 1991. Strategy - Process, Content, Context (2nd edition), Bob de Wit and Ron Meyer, West. Exploring Techniques of Analysis and Evaluation in Strategic Management, Ambrosini, V. with Johnson, G. and Scholes K. , Prentice Hall Europe, 1998. Exploring Strategic Change, Balogun, J and Hope Hailey, V. with Johnson, G. and Scholes K. , Prentice Hall Europe, 1999. Corporate Strategy, Richard Lynch, Pitman, 2nd edition, 2000. Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics, Ralph Stacey, Pitman., 2nd edn 1997. What is Strategy and does it Matter? (2nd edition), Richard Whittington, Thompson. Managing Change in Organizations, Colin Carnall, Prentice Hall, 2nd edition, 1995. Competitive Strategy, Michael Porter, Macmillan, 1982. Competitive Advantage, Michael Porter, Macmillan, 1985.Organisational Culture, Andrew Brown, Pitman, 2nd edition,1998.
Images of Organisation, Gareth Morgan, Sage.
The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, Henry Mintzberg, Prentice Hall.