Module Title |
Strategic Marketing Management |
|
Module Code |
25-6058-00L |
|
Semester of Delivery |
See Module Information Table |
|
Mandatory/Elective/Option |
See Module Information Table |
|
Level |
6 |
|
Credit Points |
20 |
|
Assessment Mode Weighting |
CWEX100 | |
Pre-requisites |
Marketing (Level five) or equivalent |
|
Co-requisites |
None | |
Class Contact Hours |
||
Average Weekly |
1.5 |
|
Directed Learning |
||
Average Weekly |
5 |
|
Module Leader |
Tim Williams |
|
|
Sheffield Business School |
|
Module Banding |
A |
|
Approval Status |
Validated |
Rationale
The strategic application of marketing principles is essential for the long term survival of all organisations. Strategic marketing planning both co-ordinates activities within the firm and directs and manages the relationships an organisation has with customers, suppliers and the wider environment.
For this reason it is argued that an understanding of the strategic marketing planning process is important for all students of business.
This module carries certain exemptions from the professional exams of the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Membership of this body is becoming increasingly important for those following a career in marketing.
Summary of AimsOn completion of this module students should be able to:
Assessment and Feedback Strategy
This module will be assessed by means of coursework and examination.
The coursework element will comprise a piece of group work based on analysis and presentation of case study material.
The group work will be spread throughout the period in which the module runs. Some verbal feedback will be given at the time of the presentation. Written feedback and marks will be given after the final group has presented.
The examination will be a single paper at the end of the module.
Module Assessment Criteria
Learning Outcome |
Assessment Criterion |
Level descriptors |
||||
Fail |
Pass |
2.2 |
2.1 |
First |
||
Outcome 1 |
Analysis of given business situations (c/w & exam) |
Incomplete or inappropriate analysis. Lack of application |
Some relevant analysis. Limited application |
Analysis shows good level of understanding. Reasonable application |
Detailed, appropriate analysis showing high level of understanding & application. |
Extensive analysis showing exceptional insight. Thoroughly & appropriately applied |
Outcome 2 |
Models, concepts & terminology used (c/w & exam) |
Inadequate use of appropriate academic underpinning. Lack of application |
Some use of relevant tools. Lacking in fluency or conviction |
Reasonable use and application of appropriate models & concepts. |
Relevant tools used and thoroughly applied. |
Comprehensive & thorough application of appropriate models & concepts. Fluent use of terminology |
Outcome 3 |
Strategic proposals and justification (c/w & exam) |
Inappropriate proposals with no sound justification |
Poorly considered proposals. Limited justification |
Appropriate, though limited proposals. Reasonable justification |
Thorough & relevant proposals supported by sound rationale |
Fully evaluated proposals showing high level of insight. Fully justified |
Outcome 4 |
Formulating suitable operational programmes (c/w & exam) |
Lack of, or inappropriate, operational recommendations |
Incomplete recommendations or limited linkage to prior analysis |
Broad proposals with some supporting justification |
Detailed operational proposals clearly stemming from strategic analysis |
Comprehensive proposals, fully justified, evaluated and wholly relevant |
Working within a group |
Working effectively as a team on group assignment (c/w) |
Lack of cohesiveness within team. Contradictory responses |
Some inconsistencies shown |
Reasonably moduleed response. No significant variance between members |
Good understanding shown by each member |
Fully consistent response. Excellent level of understanding shown by each group member |
All Outcomes |
Evidence of reading outside of module materials (c/w & exam) |
Little or no evidence of additional reading |
Some additional material introduced |
Appropriate use of a reasonable level of further material |
Introduction of a wide range of additional supporting material |
Appropriate use of a comprehensive range of relevant additional material |
All Outcomes |
Structure, clarity and accuracy of written communication (exam) |
Poorly structured, lacking clarity. Poor grammar |
Some appropriate structure. |
Reasonable structure and clarity. Few grammatical errors |
Clear and logical communication. Accurately presented |
Exceptional written communication skills. Professionally presented |
The student will show evidence of:
Teaching and Learning Strategy and Methods
Lectures will be used to introduce and discuss key concepts and to offer directed reading.
The applied nature of this module places particular emphasis on preparation and participation in the seminar programme which is designed to allow exploration of concepts and to practice their application.
Each seminar will build on the lecture programme through the introduction and discussion of articles, exercises, videos and case studies. These are designed to be highly interactive.
Students will be expected to prepare ahead of the seminars and to participate in the discussions.
Indicative Content