Module Title |
Auditing |
|
Module Code |
25-5003-00S |
|
Semester of Delivery |
See Module Information Table |
|
Mandatory/Elective/Option |
See Module Information Table |
|
Level |
5 |
|
Credit Points |
20 |
|
Assessment Mode Weighting |
Coursework |
25% |
Examination |
75% |
|
Pre-requisites |
||
Co-requisites |
None | |
Class Contact Hours |
||
Average Weekly |
2.5 |
|
Directed Learning |
||
Average Weekly |
10 |
|
Module Leader |
Alex Dunlop |
|
|
Sheffield Business School |
|
Module Banding |
A |
|
Approval Status |
Validated |
Rationale
An understanding of the nature and purpose of auditing provides a useful insight into the information systems and control procedures which exist within the modern business organisation, as well as an understanding of the ways in which external environmental factors might have a bearing on its performance. The study of auditing also provides a sound basis for the appreciation of the regulatory framework of the business entity, the interests and power of the various stakeholder groups, the manner in which corporate accountability is effected and the role of the auditor in this process.
Summary of Aims
Anticipated Learning Outcomes
On completion of the module, the student should be able to:
Assessment and Feedback Strategy
Elements of learning outcomes requiring literary search and analysis will be assessed primarily by way of individual written coursework. Skills of critical analysis and of application to practice will be assessed primarily by final examination. Students will be provided with feedback on their progress towards achieving the desired learning outcomes via a combination of seminar activities and the assessed coursework.
Module Assessment Criteria
This grid provides an indication of the nature of the assessment process across the range of candidate performance.
Learning Outcome |
Assessment Criterion (where assessed) |
Level descriptors |
||||
fail |
PASS |
2.2 |
2.1 |
First |
||
Outcomes requiring analysis and explanation |
Inadequate analysis Failure to identify key issues Poor knowledge of topic Inadequate literature review Poor conclusions and or answering question set |
Tendency to be descriptive Some issues identified Limited knowledge of topic Weak literature review Some attempt to conclude and to answer question |
Sound analysis Identification of some key issues Clear knowledge of topic Sound literature review Competent attempt to conclude and to answer question |
Critical and reasoned analysis Identification of key issues Good knowledge of topic Critical consideration of literature Critical and reasoned conclusion and answer |
Perceptive and insightful analysis Identification of key and potential issues Excellent understanding of topic Perceptive critique of literature Perceptive and insightful conclusions and tailoring of answer |
|
Outcomes requiring the demonstration of ability to apply knowledge to practical situations |
Inadequate demonstration |
Limited application to practice |
Competent attempt to relate to practice |
Reasoned application to practice |
Insightful application to practice |
Topics will be introduced by way of lectures, and developed in seminars.
The practical aspects of the module will be strongly case study based, while theoretical input will be backed by directed reading, followed by seminar discussion. Topical issues will be introduced wherever appropriate, supported by press and journal articles.
Indicative Content